Wednesday, April 18, 2007

Five Good Questions with - Clare Farnsworth & Art Spander about the Seahawks & Raiders

Today we have another doubleheader.....today’s segment of "Five Good Questions" is with Clare Farnsworth of The Seattle Post-Intelligencer.....Clare covers the Seattle Seahawks.....in the second game of the doubledip, we have Oakland Tribune columnist Art Spander.... Art has been covering the country’s top sporting events for over 40 years....Art discusses what is up with Raider Nation....

First, Clare Farnsworth about the Seahawks.....

Q1. The Seahawks do not have a first round pick this year because of the trade for Deion Branch. Now after-the-fact, are the Seahawks sorry they dealt for Branch and lost their first round pick?
Funny you should ask. I actually did a story on just that topic at the NFL scouting combine. Club president Tim Ruskell first offered a humorous response when asked if he was having any second thoughts: "Maybe on that day, I could see going, 'Who would I pick at that spot?' I might get a little shake when it gets close to the Patriots' pick." He quickly added, "No. No regrets." Coach Mike Holmgren said: "Absolutely not. No. No. Any time you think about trading a No. 1 pick for anybody, the simple question you ask is, 'If he was available to you in the draft, where you pick, would you take him?' Easy answer. I'm glad Branch is on our team." Since the combine (in February), I've revisited the subject with both - off the record - and they still say it was a no-brainer trade.

They did think the pick would be lower in the round, because they expected to finish better than 9-7. They do admit that Branch did not produce the kind of numbers last season that he probably will this season. But the bottom line might have been provided by Lions offensive coordinator Mike Martz, who weighed in with the "known commodity" vs. "crapshoot" aspect: "I think it was a heckuva move by the Seahawks. Deion Branch is an outstanding player."

Q2. Seattle has the 55th overall pick. Is there any chance they may trade to move back into the first round? If so, who would be that "special" player to make them want to trade up?
I don't see the Seahawks moving back into the first round because of the cost. It usually takes your first-round pick plus a second- or third-round pick just to move up in the round. To go from 55th overall even into the bottom of the first round would cost them almost their entire draft this year, or their first-round pick next year. They are in a situation where they don't have to come out of this draft with a player who can start immediately, but they do need depth and a couple of players who can develop into starters. So they seem content that they can get two good players on the first day.

Q3. As of today, what positions are the Seahawks looking to fill with that 55th pick?
These guys are married to the "best available player" philosophy, and it's hard to blame them. The Seahawks have been burned when they reached to fill a need and gotten some good players at positions that weren't pressing needs by going BPA (Alexander, Hutchinson, Spencer). Their priority positions are defensive tackle, guard, tight end and defensive end. Who they take, and at which position, will be determined by what happens above them and who's available. Sorry for the coach-speak, but it's true.

Q4. Are the Seahawks done in the free agent market? How would you rate their off-season moves so far?
The Seahawks still could revisit the free-agent market depending on what happens in the draft. They need more bodies on the offensive line, another pass-rushing defensive end and run-stuffing defensive tackle, more depth at cornerback, a young tight end. But they won't make another "splash" signing in free agency. First, that player isn't out there anymore. Second, they don't have the money. What they continue to look for is a veteran quarterback, which would allow them to use backup Seneca Wallace as a situational receiver, runner and returner. They can't get caught in a situation where Wallace gets hurt, then Matt Hasselbeck gets hurt. That would leave David Greene, and he's just not ready. The problem is, finding a veteran QB that will come in under these strange circumstances. They talked to David Carr, but he went to Carolina where he can be No. 2 behind Jake Delhomme.

Q5. Shaun Alexander suffered through various injuries last season. How has he been doing in the off-season and is he ready for training camp?
Shaun is actually enjoying this offseason, because it has been an "off" season. Last year, after the team's Super Bowl run and his short-lived run into the NFL record book, he was here, there and seemingly everywhere doing a little bit of everything. It took a toll. This year, he's been able to spend some down time with his family and concentrate on his offseason conditioning. As for training camp, Shaun never has done a lot - or in the preseason, either. They get him enough work to get him ready, but never overwork him. The thing to watch with Shaun is that he turns 30 on Aug. 30. Turning 30 has been the undoing of some great backs in NFL history.

Now Art Spander about the Oakland Raiders.....

Q1. First off, what is your impression of new Raiders head coach Lane Kiffin? Does he possess any unique qualities that could help him turn around the Raiders?
One thing I (and others) have learned in dealing with Al Davis ("I am the organization'') since the late 1960s is you'll never know what we will do (for example, such as drafting) Janikowski? By-passing Leinart? etc. But nobody has been able to coach them the last few years (personnel is one reason, maybe Davis intervening is another) so a change wouldn't hurt. How much control will he have? If Gruden were to answer....well, you know.

Q2. As of today, what do you think the Raiders will do with the first pick in the draft?
The consensus is Jamarcus Russell....(something I know; you can't play in the NFL without a QB) but maybe the Raiders manuever and get a (later first round) pick and somebody else.

Q3. Kiffin has stated that Randy Moss is not on the trading block. All the talk last season was that Moss is a cancer on this team. What is the lowdown on Moss?
We hear it both ways. Davis probably wants to keep Moss, for which he gave up too much, and Kiffin (smartly) wants to get rid of Moss. But for what? Rumors are Moss somehow will end up with the Packers. Good riddance. By the way, regarding Moss and our old SF friend T.O., I heard a guy on a talk show say whoever the Raiders or 49ers (who also gave that number to the dear departed Antonio Bryant) end up with as WRs.don't give out No. 81.

Q4. Does Al Davis still make all the final decisions concerning the team or has he relinquished a little of that power to new coach Lane Kiffin?
Yes. End of story.

Q5. The offensive line did a poor job at protecting the quarterback last season. Just two years ago the Raiders took lineman Robert Gallery with the second overall pick. Why has Gallery been a bust so far? And, are his days with the Raiders numbered?
Gallery may not be any good. The Raiders may have blown it. Or when they moved him from RT to LT, he may not be able to handle the biggest pass rusher. Gallery will be around at least this coming season. You don't give up on second picks so fast.

I want to thank both Clare and Art for their time....it is much appreciated!!! Also, I want to correct an error in yesterday’s column – Jim Polzin works for The Capital Times in Madison, Wisconsin.....

Tuesday, April 17, 2007

Five Good Questions Doubleheader - Brady Quinn and Joe Thomas

Today we have a doubleheader.....and none of that day-night crap either.....today’s segment of "Five Good Questions" is with Eric Hansen of The South Bend Tribune.....Eric covers Notre Dame football and provides some analysis on Brady Quinn.....in the second game of the doubledip, we have Jim Polzin of The Capital Times.... Jim covers Wisconsin football and provides some feedback about Joe Thomas.....

First, Eric Hansen about Brady Quinn....
Q1. Brady Quinn is one of the top rated quarterbacks in the draft. You have watched him over the past 4 years, describe his strengths and weaknesses.
His biggest strength is that he wants to and can get better. A lot of guys think they don't have room to imrpove. Brady wasn't just Notre Dame's most talented player last year. He was also the team's hardest worker -- in the weight room, on the field, in the film room. And he's got the kind of leadership skills, that he drags other players along with him for the ride. His knowledge of the game is so far ahead of the curve. That's going to show up in the pros. He is a good person, who stands for something, and in this day and age, I don't think you can overlook that. Weaknesses? I think sometimes he holds on to the ball too long instead of running or throwing it away.

Q2. It seems like many of the draft publications are purposely pointing out Quinn's negatives. How has Quinn handled this pressure and criticism?
I think he has handled it better than most people would have, certainly better than I could have. He hasn't just put his head in the sand and pretended the criticism wasn't there. He didn't overreact to it either and proclaim he was going to shut out the press. He pointed out when he thought writers didn't do their homework. He pointed out some inconsistencies in their arguments, but didn't dwell on it. He let his performances in the workouts do most of the talking.

Q3. One of the draft magazines stated that Quinn turned off some NFL teams at the Combine because he came across as being cocky and arrogant. What is the lowdown on Quinn's personality - is he cocky/arrogant - is he mentally tough?
I did not read that particular publication, but I was at the combine and didn't hear any of that. I don't know where that came from. This is the first I have heard of it. I think it's a fabrication on its surface, but I didn't see the story. If he received criticism, it was for not doing any throwing or running the 40. He earned big points for his personality and his interviews. That's why the question is so perplexing. It would be like asking "why was Woody Hayes so mild-mannered and shy?"

Q4. It looks like Quinn could go to the Lions or Browns. In your opinion, which of the those two teams would best fit Quinn and his style of game?
I think the Browns. I think it's an organization that's making better decisions all-around. Charlie (Weis) and Romeo (Crennel) are on the same page when it comes to coaching philosophy, so the transition would be close to seamless. I think Brady would win over Browns fans.

Q5. A question about this year's Notre Dame team. Since Jimmy Clausen enrolled at Notre Dame early, has Quinn been mentoring Clausen during the last few months? Is Jimmy Clausen going to be the starting quarterback for N.D.'s first game of the 2007 season?
I wrote about this in the paper. Quinn has spoken with all four quarterback candidates. The other positive influence on Clausen and the others has been Ron Powlus, the former ND quarterback who is in his first year as Irish quarterbacks coach. As far as Clausen being the starter against Ga Tech? I would say less than 50 percent. I think if the season started tomorrow, Demetrius Jones would be the starter. Clausen is a talent, no doubt, and mentally he is ahead of the curve. But those other three guys are all very, very good. We'll know a lot more when Charlie Weis narrows the four down to two after the spring game. My guess, the two will be Clausen and Jones, but I wouldn't be surprised if Zach Frazer snuck in there.

Now Jim Polzin about Joe Thomas.....
Q1. Joe Thomas is the top rated offensive lineman in the draft. You have watched him over the past 4 years, describe his strengths and weaknesses. Is he better at run blocking or pass protection?
Most Wisconsin offensive linemen come out of here as better run blockers because the Badgers like to pound the ball, but Thomas is better in pass protection. He's no slouch as a run blocker, but his combination of strength and athleticism make him a great pass protector. The offensive line coach at Wisconsin, Bob Palcic, coached Tony Boselli at USC and Jonathan Ogden at UCLA; Palcic said Thomas is in the same league as those two.

Q2. With the NFL cracking down on off-the-field problems with its players, what type of person is Thomas away from the football field?
Thomas is probably a better person than he is a player, and that's saying something. I think one of the things that makes him appealing to NFL teams is they know they won't have to worry about spending a bunch of money on a guy who's going to get in trouble. He never had any problems in Madison, was a respected captain and, if I'm not mistaken, managed to carry a 3.5 grade-point average while competing in football for four years and track and field for two.

Q3. A few years back, Iowa's Robert Gallery was drafted second overall and was supposed to anchor the Raiders line for many years. So far, Gallery has been a bust in Oakland. What are the differences between Gallery and Thomas?
After watching Gallery play at Iowa, I figured he'd be a star at the next level. I haven't seen him play enough in the NFL to know what the problem is. Perhaps the issue is playing for a poor franchise, and a change of scenery could work wonders for Gallery. I know this about Thomas: He's not training for the NFL Draft, he's training to be the starter in the 2007 season opener, wherever he ends up. And he wants to play in the league for a long time and play in Pro Bowls and be a Hall of Famer. He won't be satisfied with anything less.

Q4. Does Thomas have that "nasty streak" that many offensive linemen have in order to play in the NFL?
Thomas is competitive in whatever he does, whether it's playing darts against his buddies or trying to keep a defensive end away from his quarterback. I don't think you become a two-time All-American and Outland Trophy winner without a nasty streak. Perhaps some of that goes unnoticed because he's so polite and accommodating off the field.

Q5. We all know the NFL game moves at a faster pace and all the players are elite. Does Thomas have the quickness to handle a speed pass rusher?
Athleticism is what sets apart Thomas from the other left tackles in this year's draft class. Put it this way: He played tight end in high school and probably could have been a really good tight end at the college level. He was also athletic -- and versatile -- enough that the Wisconsin coaching staff moved him to defensive end on two occasions because of a shortage at that position. I think what attracted Thomas to the UW coaching staff in the first place was watching him play basketball in high school. He really moved well for such a big man and probably could have played basketball at the college level had he chosen that sport over football.

I want to thank both reporters for their time....Eric was on a tight deadline, but he still managed to find a few minutes to help me out.....and Jim came off the DL with tonsillitis to get me his thoughts.....once again, thank you both for your time....it is much appreciated!!!

Monday, April 16, 2007

You are in our thoughts

Our thoughts and prayers are with those of Virginia Tech and the people of Blacksburg....

Guest Columnist - Zach from The Big Picture

Today we have a guest columnist.....I would like to raise a frosty cold mug of Bud Lite and welcome Zach from
  • The Big Picture
  • Zach is from Seattle and part of my West Coast Connection....I encourage everyone to check out his blog....his work inspired me to get back into blogging....I have asked Zach to breakdown this year’s NFL Draft.....and after much research and studying, here are his views about the big day.....

    1. Oakland – JaMarcus Russell, QB, LSU
    2. *TRADE* Tampa (from Detroit) – Calvin Johnson, huge effin' stud, Georgia Tech
    3. Clevland – Brady Quinn, QB, Notre Dame
    4. Detroit (from Tampa) – Joe Thomas, OT, Wisconsin
    5. Arizona – Gaines Adams, DE, Clemson
    6. Washington – Amobi Okoye, DT, The 'Ville
    7. Minnesota – Adrian Peterson, RB, Oklahoma
    8. Atlanta – LaRon Landry, S, LSU
    9. Miami – Levi Brown, OT, Penn State
    10. Houston – Jamaal Anderson, DE, Arkansas
    11. San Francisco – Alan Branch, DT, Michigan
    12. Buffalo – Patrick Willis, LB, Mississippi
    13. St. Louis – Leon Hall, CB, Michigan
    14. Carolina – Paul Posluszny, LB, Penn State
    15. Pittsburgh – Jarvis Moss, DE/LB, Florida
    16. Green Bay – Marshawn Lynch, RB, Cal
    17. Jacksonville – Reggie Nelson, DB, Florida
    18. Cincinnati – Aaron Ross, CB, Texas
    19. Tennessee – Dwayne Bowe, WR, LSU
    20. New York Giants – Jon Beason, LB, The U
    21. Denver – Dwayne Jarrett, WR, USC
    22. Dallas – Darrelle Revis, CB, Pitt
    23. Kansas City – Ted Ginn Jr., the Ohio State
    24. New England – Anthony Spencer, DE, Purdue
    25. New York Jets – Adam Carriker, DE, Nebraska
    26. Philadelphia – Michael Griffin, S, Texas
    27. New Orleans - Chris Houston, DB, Arkansas
    28. New England – Tanard Jackson, DB, Syracuse
    29. Baltimore – Tony Ugoh, OT, Arkansas
    30. San Diego – Sidney Rice, WR, South Carolina
    31. Chicago – Justin Harrell, DT, Tennessee
    32. Indianapolis – Tank Tyler, DT, NC State

    Sleepers:
    -Sidney Rice from South Carolina, if he falls to the second round, will be a steal. He'll make an immediate impact next season.
    -Also like Jason Hill, wide receiver, Washington State. He's got great speed and is being overlooked by many.
    - Love Garrett Wolfe, running back, Northern Illinois. He's small, quick and elusive. Barry Sanders? Huh? Huh?
    -Daymeion Hughes, CB, Cal. The guy was a shutdown corner for an underrated defense. He would constantly cover the conference's best wide receiver. He slowed guys like USC's Dwayne Jarrett and Washington State's Jason Hill.

    Overrated:
    -Hard to tell…don't think Quinn will do much right away. Hell, same goes for Russell. Neither, in a deeper QB draft, are top-10 picks.
    -Adam Carriker, DE, Nebraska. Don't like him one bit. Some see him sneaking into the top-10.
    -Ted Ginn Jr. Unless he can return kicks like Devin Hester, he's an undersized receiver.

    Comments:
    Lots of depth at wide receiver. Many teams need them, but I think certain teams – like the 49ers at No. 11 – can wait and snag a pretty decent guy in Round 2. Say a Steve Smith or Sidney Rice. Good things happen to people that wait, right?…QBs are weaker than they've been lately. Many have Stanford's Trent Edwards the third guy behind Quinn and Russell. Edwards was out most of last year for the hapless Cardinal and unproductive when playing…I hate when teams draft on size and potential. There's something to be said for a guy who tore it up in college, no matter how tall, fast, or well-endowed he is. I like Northern Illinois' Garrett Wolfe in that regard.

    I want to thank Zach for taking the time to be a guest columnist.....I will be asking him to make more guest appearances throughout the year.....

    Sunday, April 15, 2007

    Top 10 picks are not a sure thing

    Having a top 10 pick in the NFL Draft is not a lock for success....today I am going to review the offensive players who were chosen in the top 10 of the NFL draft since 2000....each player will receive a grade of A, B, C, D, F.....then I added two more grades for those who were recently drafted and I was unable to give a grade.....IP means "incomplete, but moving in a positive direction"......IN means "incomplete, but moving in a negative direction".....

    Quarterback - there have been 10 quarterbacks chosen in the first 10 picks since 2000.....
    2000 - none - 1st qb selected was Chad Pennington at #18....
    2001 - Michael Vick (photo) - C
    2002 - David Carr - D; Joey Harrington - F
    2003 - Carson Palmer - A; Byron Leftwich - C
    2004 - Eli Manning - C; Phillip Rivers - B
    2005 - Alex Smith - C
    2006 - Vince Young - IP; Matt Leinart - IP

    Running back - there have been 7 running backs chosen in the first 10 picks since 2000....
    2000 - Jamal Lewis - B; Thomas Jones - B
    2001 - Ladainian Tomlinson (photo) - A+
    2002 - none - 1st rb selected was William Green at #16
    2003 - none - 1st rb selected was Willis McGahee at #23
    2004 - none - 1st rb selected was Steven Jackson at #24
    2005 - Ronnie Brown - C; Cadillac Williams - C; Cedric Benson - C
    2006 - Reggie Bush - B

    Wide receiver/tight end - there have been 15 wr/te chosen in the first 10 picks since 2000
    2000 - Peter Warrick - D; Plaxico Burress - B; Travis Taylor - F
    2001 - David Terrell - F; Koren Robinson - D
    2002 - none - 1st wr selected was Donte Stallworth at #13
    2003 - Charlie Rogers (photo) - F; Andre Johnson - A
    2004 - Larry Fitzgerald - A; Kellen Winslow - B; Roy Williams - A; Reggie Williams - C
    2005 - Braylon Edwards - IP; Troy Williamson - F; Mike Williams - D
    2006 - Vernon Davis - IP

    Offensive line - there have been 8 offensive linemen chosen in the first 10 picks since 2000
    2000 - Chris Samuels - A
    2001 - Leonard Davis - C
    2002 - Mike Williams - F; Bryant McKinnie - B; Levi Jones - B
    2003 - Jordan Gross - F
    2004 - Robert Gallery (photo) - F
    2005 - none - 1st selected was Jammal Brown at #13
    2006 - D’Brickashaw Ferguson - IP

    Summary - I was surprised that only 7 running backs were selected.....Jamal Lewis got a B because of his off-the-field issues.....plus, he did not deserve an A along with L.T.....no way!!!...
    .
    Of the 10 quarterbacks selected, only Carson Palmer is rated an A in my book......I gave Vick a C.....yes, he has been to the Pro Bowl and taken his team to the NFC title game....but come on, it seems like every year it is another learning curve for this guy....he has been in the league for 6 years and he is still learning???......he is a talent, but he is more of a media talent with his flashy plays than being a consistent good quarterback over a 16 week period.....

    At the wr/te position, it seems like it is hit or bust.....either you get a stud who is an A receiver or a dud, like Rogers or Terrell who are a total flop and you end up with egg on your face, unless of course you are Matt Millen......I will say this about wr Mike Williams....I gave him a grade of D, but I really do believe that if he was on another team, this guy could become a B receiver.....

    On the offensive line, Chris Samuels has been the only stud.....the biggest bust of all may be Robert Gallery.....he may be the modern day Tony Mandarich -- all the physical tools, but unable to make it work when it counts.....I’ll be honest about Jordan Gross, I don’t even remember this guy.....I had to do some research on him....

    I will review the defensive side of the ball at a later date....



    Finally I want to recognize Jackie Robinson today.....60 years ago today
    he made a
    statement....Thank You Jackie!!!












    Saturday, April 14, 2007

    Five Good Questions with . . . Mike Reiss of The Boston Globe about the Patriots


    Today's segment of "Five Good Questions" is with Mike Reiss of The Boston Globe....Mike covers the New England Patriots provided some feedback their upcoming NFL draft.....


    Q1. First off, is there any chance the Patriots package up the 24th and 28th picks to try and move up for one "stud" player? If so, who would they be looking at?
    I would say it's unlikely that the Patriots would move into the position to land a "stud" player. If they were to take that course of action, I'd put LSU safety LaRon Landry as the player they'd go get.


    Q2. If they keep the 2 first round picks, what must the Patriots address with those picks? Who would you take with those 2 picks?
    I'd put linebacker and defensive back at the top of the Patriots' needs list. Since the picks are at 24 and 28, a lot will depend who is still on the board at that time.


    Q3. People are talking about the multi-position player Eric Weddle from Utah and that he would be a great fit with the Patriots. Do the Patriots have an interest in Weddle?
    The Patriots have not had many discussions with Weddle, but that is not always an accurate measure of interest.


    Q4. How unhappy is Asante Samuel about being "franchised?" Is he going to be a problem this upcoming season?
    Samuel expressed his displeasure with the current state of contract negotiations in a recent piece with NFL Network's Adam Schefter. As of now, he said he would consider holding out.


    Q5. Who are a few sleeper picks that you can see the Patriots making in the first 2 or 3 rounds?
    Florida State wide receiver Chris Davis is a third-round type sleeper. I'd put Davis's teammate, running back Lorenzo Booker, in that category as well.


    I want to thank Mike Reiss for taking the time to respond.....it is much appreciated!!!


    Here are a few interesting stories on the internet.....
    - Mark Story of The Lexington Herald-Leader has a column which appeared in Friday’s edition...Story writes that the university should recognize Tubby Smith.....
  • Tubby Smith Story


  • - Legendary Chicago Daily News sports columnist Dave Nightengale dies.....

  • Dave Nightengale

  • - L.A. Times columnist J.A. Adande writes about Clippers guard Sam Cassell and his veteran experience....
    Sam Cassell Story

    Friday, April 13, 2007

    Final Thoughts about the Don Imus Saga

    Earlier this week I gave my views about the Don Imus Saga....throughout the week as we talked about this incident at the ‘water cooler" (even though we don’t actually have a water cooler) at work, I continued to state that Imus is not the sole problem here.....I talked to my African-American co-workers and they agreed with me....

    What Imus said was wrong....but there is a bigger problem with racism in society than calling someone a "nappy headed ho".....this isn't about the Rutgers basketball team....who gives two hoots about Rutgers basketball....there is bigger problem....

    Finally a national journalist stood up and basically stated the same thoughts that I have....Kansas City Star columnist Jason Whitlock, who is African-American, has a different view about this situation....Whitlock wrote that Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson are basically grandstanding and fighting the battle of racism the old fashion way where someone has to lose their job....

    I give Whitlock credit for standing his ground and stating his opinion even if it is not considered popular.....too many of these liberal media wonks have fallen in line like Soviet soldiers in blasting Imus instead of having the "grapefruits" to get to the real problem.....it is easy to sitback and blast Imus....but it takes courage to tackle the real problem of racism....

    Sharpton, Jackson, Rutgers basketball coach Vivian Stringer and others missed the opportunity to address the real problem – the lack of respect that talk-show hosts, rappers, and other individuals who have the people's ear nationally have for each other....

    Instead of addressing this problem head-on and talking about the crap that rappers "rap", people like Whoppi Goldberg sidestepped the issue.....she said the language that is used in rap songs is in a different context than what Imus stated.....

    No it isn’t!!!!!.....

    Rappers like Eminem, 50 Cent, Lil Boosie, and other knuckleheads are using their medium (music) to instill hateful and hurtful comments to people.....our youth listen to these lyrics and think it's "cool" to call a woman a ho, slut, tramp, slit, etc., etc....

    Instead of Jackson and Sharpton calling for Imus’ head, these two clowns should have put all these rappers, both white and African-American, to task also....why doesn’t Sharpton chastise these thug rappers on his radio show?.....for people like Sharpton and Jackson, it’s a double standard.....and both idiots have never met a camera they didn't like....

    I ask this question to the African-American community in this country, "when will the African-American community finally get fed up with the bullshit of knuckleheads like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson and look to a new African-American leader who will try to make intelligent headway with racism instead of mugging in front of the television cameras".....When???.....I will tell you this, until Jackson and Sharpton get pushed aside, racism will still be a big problem in this country....

    Here is the link to read Whitlock’s column.....

  • Whitlock
  • Five Good Questions with . . . John Shinn of The Norman Transcript about Adrian Peterson


    Today's segment of "Five Good Questions" is with John Shinn of The Norman (Oklahoma) Transcript ....John covers Oklahoma football for The Transcript and provided some feedback about stud running back Adrian Peterson....
    Q1. Adrian Peterson is the top rated running back in the draft. You have watched him over the past 3 years, describe his strengths and weaknesses.
    His strengths are speed and power. He's probably the best between-the tackles tailback I've seen in college football. He always hit holes with a burst and always moved the pile forward. He is also very tough to bring down one-on-one. Few times can I recall a defensive back or linebacker making a solo tackle in the open field. His weakness is his ability to help on third down. He's impressed NFL people with his pass-catching ability during workouts, but blocking kept him off the field during passing situations at Oklahoma. It's the part of his game that needs the most work.
    Q2. With all the various styles of blocking and offenses in the NFL, will Peterson have a problem with any specific offense or is he capable of adjusting?
    He would have a problem playing in an offense that doesn't emphasize running between the tackles. An offense like Denver's would be a bad fit because most of the running plays are "stretch" plays where he would have to read blocks and make immediate cuts. He struggled with that at OU. He tended to try to outrun everyone to the sideline like he was still in high school. Obviously, a spread offense where they throw the ball to the runningback 10-15 times a game would also be a bad fit.
    Q3. Character and off-the-field activities are a hot topic in the NFL these days. Are there any red-flags that NFL teams should be aware of about Peterson?
    He had no brushes with the law during his time at OU. He was suspended for a couple of practices and didn't start one game due to missing class his sophomore season. But in the locker room every player I ever talked to said he was an ideal teammate. I can't imagine any off-the-field stuff turning teams away.
    Q4. The Cleveland Browns are supposedly interested in Peterson with the 3rd pick and so is Tampa Bay with the 4th pick. However, both teams already have veteran running backs, Jamal Lewis in Cleveland and Cadillac Williams in Tampa. If Peterson is selected by one of these two teams, do you think he will be frustrated if he is not given the opportunity to be "the man" right away?
    I think he would fit in perfectly with Cleveland. He's faster than Lewis, but both have the same running style. Those two guys could bang away at defenses without the worry of wearing one down. I think if the Bucs took him, it would signal Cadillac Williams is going to be traded within two years.
    Q5. In your opinion, is Adrian Peterson an impact player who can immediately help an NFL team?
    I could if he winds up on a team with a good defense. He'll be great at pounding away at defenses in the second half of games. But his impact won't be the same if he's on a team that tends to fall behind early. His worst games at OU were always the ones where the Sooners fell behind early.
    I want to thank John Shinn for taking the time to respond.....it is much appreciated!!!....tomorrow we will hear from Mike Reiss of The Boston Globe about his thoughts on the New England Patriots....

    Thursday, April 12, 2007

    Five Good Questions with . . . Brian Bennett of The Louisville Courier-Journal about the Cardinals


    Today's segment of "Five Good Questions" is with Brian Bennett of The Louisville Courier-Journal ....Brian covers Louisville football for The Courier-Journal and provided some feedback about the Cardinals players who are preparing for the draft....

    Q1. After suffering a devastating leg injury in the first game of the season, Michael Bush still chose to enter the NFL draft. Where do you think he is going to be selected? If he did not get injured, where do you think Bush would have been selected?
    Well, I think Michael Bush might be the most intriguing prospect in the draft. His talent really isn't in question, but his health certainly is. He recently had another surgery on the leg and isn't expected to run at full speed now until July. So whichever team drafts him will be doing so with a lot of unknowns. For this reason, I suspect Bush will not be taken before the third round, and I could see him slipping to the second day. Of course, all it takes is one team to believe in him, and so that could change. Had he not gotten hurt, I think Bush was a first- or second-rounder for sure.

    Q2. All the draft publications have been praising Amobi Okoye as his stock has been rising. I notice that he is listed at 287 pounds while defensive tackles often tip 310 plus. Do you think his weight and youth are going to be an issue in the NFL?
    Amobi weighed in at 301 pounds at Louisville's Pro Day last month. His weight has fluctuated quite a bit since the season ended. He actually lost some weight before his senior season, and that seemed to help him play faster and use his motor more. I can't see the weight issue being a major factor. I think any NFL team that wants him heavier can simply realize he's 19 years old and that he has plenty of room to grow. In a sense, it's a huge advantage drafting a 19-year-old rather than a 22-year-old senior, because you can control his rights longer.

    Q3. Inside linebacker Nate Harris has the talent to make it in the NFL. However, character issues off the field may be scaring teams away to the point that he gets selected late on Day 2. What is the lowdown on Harris?
    I don't know if the character issue is a big problem right now. Nate obviously had his run-in with the law as a high school senior, but he has kept his nose clean ever since and by all accounts was a model citizen during his two years at Louisville. If there's anything that's holding him back, it might be his size. At 6-foot-1 and 230 pounds, he's a shade small for an NFL linebacker. But he had a strong performance at Pro Day, and I think he'll get drafted because of his athleticism.

    Q4. Why has the Louisville program been able to produce quality NFL prospects of late?
    The recruiting definitely improved at Louisville in recent years. The Cardinals have always had a lot of pro talent on the roster, but some of that in the recent past stemmed from the fact that they were willing to admit players with somewhat questionable backgrounds. Now, with their on-field success, they're getting in with top high school talents without character questions. The other thing that I think helps is that they have run a pro-style offense and, for the most part, pro-style defensive schemes that both attract players and prepare them for the NFL.

    Q5. What future NFL draft "studs" are currently on the Louisville team who we should keep an eye on in the future?
    Obviously, quarterback Brian Brohm is at the top of any list. He has the potential to be a No. 1 overall pick with a strong senior season. Wide receiver Mario Urrutia, who's 6-foot-6, could also be a first-rounder if he excels as a junior, and fellow receiver Harry Douglas, while small in stature, has been incredibly productive and could be a Deion Branch type. On defense, a name to remember is sophomore-to-be Peanut Whitehead. He was one of the top recruits in Alabama, and if he continues to blossom, he could develop into one of the top defensive ends in the country.

    I want to thank Brian Bennett for taking the time to respond.....it is much appreciated!!!....tomorrow we will hear from John Shinn of The Norman (Oklahoma) Transcript about his thoughts on stud running back Adrian Peterson....

    On Monday, in a way to promote other quality bloggers, we will hear from Zach of The Big Picture and his thoughts about the upcoming draft....

    Also, here are two links to stories that I thought were interesting......the first is from Mike Reiss of The Boston Globe.....Mike writes about how Bill Belichick is working to repair his friendship with Eric Mangini.....
  • Belichick Story

  • The second link is from Nancy Gay of The San Francisco Chronicle about new Raiders head coach Lane Kiffin....

  • Lane Kiffin Story
  • Wednesday, April 11, 2007

    Five Good Questions with . . . Kent Somers of The Arizona Republic about the Cardinals


    Today's segment of "Five Good Questions" is with Kent Somers of The Arizona Republic....Kent is the NFL beat writer for The Arizona Republic and provided some feedback about the Arizona Cardinals...

    Q1. What is the biggest need the Cardinals have to address with the 5th overall pick?
    The biggest need they have in the draft is offensive line, specifically a left tackle. Leonard Davis left via free agency, and while he never lived up to his potential, the Cardinals don't have anyone ready to step in. Right now, it's a battle between Oliver Ross and Mike Gandy. I'm not sure, however, if they address this position with the fifth overall pick, unless Wisconsin tackle Joe Thomas is there. As usual, this team has plenty of needs: an outside linebacker, a pass-rushing defensive end, a cornerback, etc. They could go a number of ways and still fill a need.

    Q2. If Adrian Peterson should slide to the Cards at number 5, do you think they will select him even though they have Edgerrin James and other needs to fill?
    I think it's possible; it depends upon who else is available to them. Peterson is certainly a dynamic talent. I watched him a lot in college and he's a special guy, but he doesn't avoid many hits and he was injured a lot. He would give the Cardinals a big-play threat at running back. James is a nice hunt-and-peck kind of runner but he's not very explosive. Peterson would add that dimension. Plus, coach Ken Whisenhunt wants to run the ball 550 or so times a season, so the club needs two backs to be able to do that.

    Q3. During the early part of the draft season, most publications had the Cardinals taking Michigan's Alan Branch. However, Branch's stock has slipped of late. Are the Cards still interested in him or has another defensive player moved past him in the organization's eyes?
    It's hard to say. You can't believe much of what anyone in the NFL says these days about the draft. Smokescreens, lies and more deception are the order of the day. I think it would be more likely they would take Clemson's Gaines Adams than Branch.

    Q4. Have the Cardinals players been receptive to new coach Ken Whisenhunt?
    So far they have, but he has yet to coach his first practice. I think they'll like him. He's smart. He has a plan. He makes sense when he talks to them. That wasn't always the case with Dennis Green. A former player, Whisenhunt I think will have a good feel for working the players hard yet knowing when to back off. He seems like he will be willing to listen to players' ideas.

    Q5. Ultimately, who is the Cardinals "dream" pick at number 5?
    Wow, that's hard to say. Remember, this is a team that once traded the No. 6 pick and the chance to take Terrell Suggs for the 17th and 18th picks where they took two guys who should have gone in the second round. I'd say they would love it if Joe Thomas was there at No. 5. From everything I read and see, you can just plug that guy in for the next 10 years.

    I want to thank Kent Somers for taking the time to respond.....it is much appreciated!!!....tomorrow we will hear from Brian Bennett of The Louisville Courier-Journal about the Louisville Cardinals players who are getting ready for the draft...

    Tuesday, April 10, 2007

    Comments on the Don Imus Saga

    I wasn’t planning on commenting about the Don Imus situation, however, I changed my mind since it will not go away....

    First off, I am not a Imus fan....honestly, I have never listened to his show....in fact, I think the guy is a shriveled prune who needs a haircut....

    Anyway, I do not defend nor condone the remarks he made about the Rutgers women’s basketball team....it was totally wrong and unprofessional to call them "nappy haired hos".....whether he was joking or not, it was inappropriate to make those comments....

    After just watching the NBC Nightly News, I saw where the Rutgers basketball coach, Vivian Stringer, spoke out that something positive needs to come of this....

    She is right -- something positive needs to come of it.....but it should not stop with just Don Imus....
    The so-called music that young people listen to today is loaded with derogatory and sexual remarks about women....

    I just looked on the I Tunes store and there is some group called Lil Boosie.....so I looked up the lyrics to some of the garbage (I won’t even call it songs) they perform....there is a song called "Fo My Thugz".....the lyrics state:
    This is for my hoes who love dick

    And be bout that thug shit
    Ain't with that stud and they just ready to fuck quick
    This is for my hoes who smoke joe
    Go to the club and warm hoes

    Later on, there are these lyrics:
    This is for the pill poppin hoes

    Who ready to take off they clothes
    Who smoke weed all day
    But don't fuck wit they nose
    This is for the real ass hoes

    Here is some crap from the Ying Yang Twins from a song called "1st Booty on Duty"

    Some of these bitches be real the hard knock
    Watchin gettin crunk they start they won´t stop
    Hoes get naked for weed they love that
    Take the baddest bitch in the club I fuck that
    You fuck that, I fuck that, I fuck that, you fuck that, I fuck that, I fuck that


    These are just two samples of garbage that is out there on CDs that is made by both white and African-American rappers....(believe me, I am not singling out African-American rappers at all)....

    So I guess if Don Imus would have put his comments to music and a good beat, he would have been called "real" and someone who has "street cred"....

    I also think it is unfair for the Rev. Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson to call for Imus’ firing....if Sharpton is truly sincere about the use of these horrible words, then why doesn’t he choose to bring thugs like 50 Cent, Eminem, Lil Boosie and others to task?....

    I also think that Jesse Jackson is far from being the moral voice of this situation.....this is coming from the same man who called Jews "hymies"......the same "moral" man who had an extramarital affair and an illegitimate child....so it is time for Jesse Jackson to take his protest placards and just go away....

    If something positive is to come out of this, we need people like Vivian Stringer to talk about it - not Jesse Jackson nor Al Sharpton -- two people who never shied away from a camera....

    This incident should not be about Don Imus alone.....it should not be about race alone....it should be about having all people, including these so-called "artists" clean up their acts and learn how to respect people and especially women....


    People in this world lack respect for one another....and anyone who is calling another person a "ho", whether it be Don Imus or 50 Cent needs to be taken to task about it by our so-called leaders....

    Five Good Questions with . . . Kevin Seifert of The Minnesota Star-Tribune about the Vikings


    Today's segment of "Five Good Questions" is with Kevin Seifert of The Minnesota Star-Tribune ....Kevin is the NFL beat writer for The Star-Tribune and provided some feedback about the Minnesota Vikings...

    Q1. Do the Vikings plan on going into this season with Tarvaris Jackson as their starting quarterback? Has he progressed during the off-season?
    Officially, they're saying Jackson and Brooks Bollinger will be competing for the starting job. That will hold true even if they draft a quarterback in the first round, which I doubt they will. There won't really be any evidence of Jackson's progress until the spring practice season really gets underway in May and June.

    Q2. If things bounce just right, it is quite possible that Brady Quinn could be there for the Vikings at the 7th spot. First, do the Vikings have an interest in Quinn and do they take him if he is there at number 7?
    They have spent a good deal of time investigating Quinn and I don't doubt they consider him a good prospect. My guess is that if Quinn is available at No. 7, they will work very hard to trade down.

    Q3. Some draft publications have the Vikings going with a wide receiver in the first round. With a plethora of receivers in this draft, are the Vikings considering moving down in the draft?
    If they're going to take a WR in the first round, it's going to have to be after trading down. The only guy worthy of being taken No. 7 overall is Calvin Johnson, who will be long gone by then. Again, I think it's likely they will really try to trade down.

    Q4. Who best fits the Vikings defense - Alan Branch, Gaines Adams, LaRon Landry, or Jamaal Anderson?
    As far as need goes, I'm guessing Gaines Adams is the best fit for them. Like most teams, they really need better outside pass rush. But a guy like LaRon Landry can help any defense. All defenses are better when they have an instinctive, hard-hitting safety.

    Q5. Are there going to be any changes to the Vikings defense since Mike Tomlin moved onto Pittsburgh?
    The biggest change will be more blitzing with Leslie Frazier, who learned the scheme will playing for the Bears under Mike Ditka and Buddy Ryan in the mid-1980's. It'll still be the same base scheme, but probably with more blitzing.

    I want to thank Kevin Seifert for taking the time to respond.....it is much appreciated!!!....tomorrow we will hear from Kent Somers of The Arizona Republic about the Arizona Cardinals....

    Monday, April 09, 2007

    Five Good Questions with . . . Tony Grossi of The Cleveland Plain Dealer about the Browns

    Today's segment of "Five Good Questions" is with Tony Grossi of The Plain Dealer (Cleveland)....Tony is the NFL beat writer for The Plain Dealer and provided some feedback about the Cleveland Browns....

    Q1. Supposedly the Browns have "cooled" on Adrian Peterson. However, do you think that is a ploy by G.M. Phil Savage? I don't know where some of this stuff on the Internet comes from. I know the Browns were really hot on Peterson during the last college football season. Maybe upon further examination their interest has cooled. But maybe not. I'm not 100% sure. I can still see them taking him at No. 3, though I would not.

    Q2. If you were the Browns G.M., who would you select among these players - Peterson, Thomas, Quinn, or Johnson and why?
    To me, it is an incredibly difficult decision between Thomas and Quinn. Let's just assume the character of these two men are impeccable -- no flaws. Thomas would fill a great need at left tackle. If he is a 10-year stalwart at the position, he and Eric Steinbach would give the Browns a true foundation on the left side. Believe it or not, Thomas would probably excite the Cleveland fan base more than Quinn because Browns fans have been pining for a blue chip LT for decades. But, in my opinion, you cannot keep passing on potential great quarterbacks in the top 10 of the draft as long as your QB position is as iffy as the Browns. If Quinn is the real deal -- a future Tom Brady, say -- he should be the pick. I don't know if he is. That's Phil Savage's job to determine.

    Q3. Concerning Brady Quinn, let's look at it from the reverse side. Why shouldn't the Browns draft Quinn?
    Drafting a young QB automatically signals another rebuilding phase. It almost assures the team won't win consistently for 2 more years. The Browns have severe needs at other areas and failing to fill them will assure the team of more growing pains.

    Q4. As of today, what are the chances the Browns trade down?
    I think they are 70-30 against. Detroit is in the driver's seat to trade down. If the Lions fail to do that, the Browns chances improve to 50-50 while they are on the clock. This would be my preference, but I would still have to think long and hard about Quinn if he is there. Thomas, too. The trade would have to be pretty good to pass up either.

    Q5. So far, Braylon Edwards has not lived up the expectations of the 3rd overall pick. Why hasn't Edwards excelled so far with the Browns? What do both Edwards and Crennel need to do, on and off the field, to take advantage of his skills?
    Edwards did well to recover from knee surgery and not miss a game in 2006. That feat was overlooked because of some behavioral issues. He is a good kid who needs to mature. I believe Crennel should have come down harder on him last year, but it's too late now. Beyond all the issues -- Edwards' sideline rants, his selfishness in attending an OSU-Michigan game the night before a big rivalry game, etc. -- the guy has to stop dropping balls. His inconsistency in catching the ball is my biggest hangup with him.

    I want to thank Tony Grossi for taking the time to respond.....it is much appreciated!!!....tomorrow we will hear from Kevin Seifert of The Minnesota Star-Tribune about the Minnesota Vikings....

    Sunday, April 08, 2007

    Random Thoughts

    Somehow, Tiger Woods has worked his way back into contention for The Master’s title....this may be one of his best golfing efforts just to stay in contention as the Augusta course has gotten tougher.....

    Woods is a heavy favorite over leader Stuart Appleby.....you would have to put $35 just to win $10 on Tiger.....while if you want Appleby, you have to put $10 to win $25.....I’m putting my money on Appleby....

    The Kansas State fans need to chill out about Bob Huggins leaving Manhattan to take the job at his alma mater, West Virginia.....Huggins also gets the opportunity to go against his former school, Cincinnati, since they are both in the Big East.....you cannot blame someone who leaves to become a head coach at their alma mater....isn’t that like a Man Law or something?....

    Plus, star recruit Michael Beasley is going to honor his commitment to Kansas State.....the Wildcat fans need to grow some grapefruits and stop whining.....

    Wasn’t Rose McGowan once married to Marilyn Manson?....come to think of it, what ever happened to M2?.....

    Why would Major League Baseball schedule a non-divisional game in a northern city so early in the season....MLB scheduled the Seattle Mariners for a 4-game set in Cleveland this weekend....it is the Mariners only trip into Cleveland all year....why wouldn’t MLB schedule a divisional foe instead in case there is inclement weather, it is easier to re-schedule a game.....

    Nice first outing by Dice-K.....

    Has anyone seen the new Barbasol commercial with the Swedish woman?.....whew....

    For some reason, I think the Republicans are trying their hardest not to like Rudy.....

    Instead of Fred Thompson, I would rather see Jack McCoy run for president....

    While watching a Minnesota Twins game earlier this week, the announcers stated that Twins first baseman Justin Morneau is only the 3rd player to ever win a league MVP before ever making an All-Star game.....the other two were Kirk Gibson and Terry Pendleton....

    Finally, Happy Easter to everyone.....God Bless You and God Bless America....

    Saturday, April 07, 2007

    Five Good Questions with . . . Mark Curnutte of the Cincinnati Enquirer about the Bengals


    Today's segment of "Five Good Questions" is with Mark Curnutte from The Cincinnati Enquirer....Mark is the NFL beat writer for The Enquirer and provided some feedback about the Cincinnati Bengals....

    Q1. How serious do you think the Bengals organization is when they stated they were not going to draft players who have a history of off-the-field problems?
    The Bengals are serious. They can not afford to mislead their fans again, which many believe they did a year ago. They should have no trouble finding talented players who fit what they need and what they do who will not get in trouble off the field.

    Q2. Chris Henry (photo) has a load of talent but he is the league poster child of bad off-the-field behavior. Do you think Henry will be able to change his image and become an All-Pro athlete on and off the field?
    From all accounts, Henry will be suspended some time later this week for at least part of the upcoming season, if not all of it. I would suggest that Adam "Pacman" Jones is the poster boy, though Henry's series of off-field legal brushes is troubling to the NFL.

    Q3. Linebacker Ahmad Brooks had a bad reputation while at Virginia therefore many NFL teams did not take a chance on him in the supplemental draft. However, the team has not had any problems with Brooks as he is progressing on the field. Why has Brooks been able to stay out of trouble while many of his teammates have not?
    Brooks is a relatively bright man who appears to have learned from his mistakes at Virginia. There seems to be a seriousness to him that Henry, for one, lacks.

    Q4. Coming into the draft, what positions must the Bengals address?
    Defense, defense, defense. I would say they need a playmaking linebacker, a safety and another cornerback, if not another defensive tackle. They do not have a third-round pick because of taking Brooks in the supplemental draft last year. They pick at Nos. 18 and 49 overall on Day 1 and should take defensive players with both. And they will need to take players, who, like first-round pick Johnathan Joseph in 2006, can contribute as rookies.

    Q5. Rudi Johnson has been a workhorse the last few years, however, so many NFL teams are now using a two-back rotation. Do you think the Bengals will address the running back position early in the draft to try and get Johnson some help?
    They did that in 2004 with Chris Perry, but Perry has essentially missed his first and third seasons with injuries. The team re-signed Kenny Watson as a free agent in March, and though he is not flashy, Watson is a solid runner and decent receiver out of the backfield. Plus he blocks like a beast, so much so Carson Palmer lobbied for his return. But you're right: A healthy Chris Perry to spell Rudi Johnson would help the run game. But I do not see the Bengals using a draft pick on a running back. They have Quincy Wilson around (former WVa player), who knows the system and could do more than a second-day pick.

    I want to thank Mark Curnutte for taking the time to respond.....it is much appreciated!!!....

    Friday, April 06, 2007

    Supporting my fellow bloggers against Colin Cowturd

    I am supporting my fellow bloggers after ESPN radio’s Colin Cowherd deliberately asked his listeners to flood The Big Lead blog in order to overload the server and force it to shutdown because they wrote something about him that he did not like....

    Cowherd needs to grow up instead of acting like a child....he is supposed to be a professional....I could never see someone like Tony Kornheiser, Dan Patrick, Mike and Mike, etc do something as childish as this....

    Cowherd needs to understand that when you are in the national spotlight, like he is, he has to accept criticism whether it is fair or unfair....no doubt there are people who do not like other media personalities....look at all the flak that Katie Couric has taken over the last year....but you do not see Couric acting childish and asking her listeners to overload a server....

    Cowherd needs to get counseling....

    Five Good Questions with . . . Sam Farmer of The Los Angeles Times about Dwayne Jarrett and USC


    Today's segment of "Five Good Questions" is with Sam Farmer of The Los Angeles Times....Sam is the NFL beat for The Times and provided some feedback about Southern Cal wide receiver Dwayne Jarrett and other USC players who are preparing for this year's NFL Draft....

    Q1. Many draft publications have Dwayne Jarrett being drafted in the mid-to-late teens. Do you think he is sorry he did not stay for his senior year to try and be a top 10 pick?
    No, I think he's happy to be coming out this season, even though this is an especially strong draft class for receivers. There's certainly no guarantee that another year will bump up his stock. As always, players also have to weigh the risk of injury, a deep class, and/or an unspectacular senior season.

    Q2. Character and off-the-field activities are a hot topic in the NFL these days. Do you think Jarrett may have raised some team's concerns after showboating a bit in the Rose Bowl?
    No. I think some NFL teams might roll their eyes at showboating, but I don't think it would dissuade a team from taking a guy. Real off-the-field issues are a different story, of course. I talked to several NFL scouts about Jarrett immediately after the Rose Bowl, and they said he did nothing but bolster his value. He had 11 catches for a career-best 205 yards and two touchdowns and was chosen offensive player of the game.

    Afterwards, I caught Leon Hall, the outstanding Michigan corner on the way to the bus. He told me: "He's pretty much Dwayne Jarrett, as advertised. I knew he was good before this game, but after today? Definitely."

    If Jarrett made a big error this offseason, it was his decision not to work out at the combine. That was a mistake -- and one that could cost him.

    Q3. Outside linebacker Dallas Sartz is projected to be a 5th or 6th round pick. Do you think Sartz could be a "sleeper" pick and make an impact in the NFL?
    By all accounts, Dallas is a good kid with his head on straight. That could help him make a roster. I don't think he'll be more than a special-teams player.

    Q4. Some publications have wide receiver Steve Smith to be selected late in the first round while others have him going in the third round. Where do you see him going and why?
    I think he's a second-round pick in the Keary Colbert mold. He runs crisp, precise routes and he's sneaky fast. I can see him being a No. 2 receiver within three years.

    Q5. Besides USC players, are there any other PAC-10 players who are "sleepers" in this year's draft who may have an impact in the NFL?
    I like Cal RB Marshawn Lynch, ASU tight end Zach Miller, UCLA kicker Justin Medlock, Stanford ILB Michael Okwo, Arizona S Michael Johnson, and one more USC player - C Ryan Kalil

    I want to thank Sam Farmer for taking the time to respond.....it is much appreciated!!!....tomorrow we will hear from Mark Curnutte from The Cincinnati Enquirer about the Cincinnati Bengals....

    Thursday, April 05, 2007

    Five Good Questions with . . . Paul Strelow of The State (Columbia, SC) about Gaines Adams


    Today's segment of "Five Good Questions" is with Paul Strelow of The State newspaper in Columbia, S.C.....Paul covers Clemson football and provided some feedback about Gaines Adams, one of the top ranked defensive linemen, and other Clemson players who are preparing for this year's NFL Draft....

    Q1. Many draft publications have Gaines Adams (photo) as the top rated defensive end. Tell us what makes Adams this highly rated.
    Adams possesses what few at his position do -- the quickness and burst to mount a speed rush from the DE spot, while also retaining the size and strength to be an every-down player against the run. Adams still has his weaknesses -- he has yet to develop the counter interior move to offset the outside bull rush, and he must improve his hand techniques. But the raw tools are there.
    Q2. Adams had 12.5 sacks and 16.5 TFL last season. Who currently in the NFL does he remind you of?
    Simeon Rice, without the chip on his shoulder -- for better and for worse.
    Q3. Cornerback C.J. Gaddis is rated low for his position. This is the same guy who held Calvin Johnson without a catch this season. Why is Gaddis rated so low?
    Some feel he's a tweener between safety and corner. He's stout and a superb athlete, but he does not display a good feel for the game, nor does he make a ton of plays. It's true that Johnson was held without a catch, but that was as much Clemson's ability to rattle Tech QB Reggie Ball.
    Q4. Draft publications have good and bad things to say about wide receiver Chansi Stuckey. What does Stuckey have to improve upon in order to be successful at the next level?
    Someone as slight as Stuckey has to develop a niche to get his foot in the door. He is quick rather than fast, so if he can be a more consistent pass-catcher and make the adjustment to being a slot receiver who can take the beating going over the middle, he'll make a career for himself.
    Q5. What future NFL draft "studs" are currently on the Clemson team who we should keep an eye on in the future?
    Rising sophomore RB C.J. Spiller has future 1st-rounder written all over him. He's shifty with sprinter's speed and good vision, and in many circles has been compared to Reggie Bush. Senior LT Barry Richardson (6-7, 330) will be a first-day pick and possibly a 1st-rounder if he improves finishing his blocks. Junior RB James Davis, sophomore RG Thomas Austin and sophomore DE Ricky Sapp are guys to keep an eye on down the road as well.

    I want to thank Paul Strelow for taking the time to respond.....it is much appreciated!!!....tomorrow we will hear from Sam Farmer of The Los Angeles Times about Dwayne Jarrett and the USC players who are preparing for the draft.....

    Wednesday, April 04, 2007

    Five Good Questions with . . . John Davis of the Oxford (Miss) Eagle - NFL Draft


    Today's segment of "Five Good Questions" is with John Davis of the Oxford (Miss) Eagle....John covers Ole Miss football and provided some feedback about Patrick Willis, the top rated inside linebacker in this year's NFL Draft....

    Q1. Patrick Willis (photo) is considered the top inside linebacker in the country even though many people did not see Ole Miss play this year. What is your observation of Willis?
    Willis is the best linebacker in the country simply because he is either making every play or in the vicinty when a tackle is made. He seems to be everywhere on the field. He also played through several injuries his junior year and nothing ever stopped his production. For a guy who grew up watching Miami Hurricane football in person, Willis is as good as Ray Lewis or Mike Barrow. He will be in the pros for many years.

    Q2. Character and off-the-field activities are a hot topic in the NFL these days. What type of player is Willis off-the-field?
    He is an outstanding character guy. He is a good student, always showed up for media interviews and donated his time to local charities and school children. There aren't too many better than Patrick.

    Q3. Can Willis handle the speed in the NFL?
    He ran the second fastest 40 time at the combine at 4.49. He's plenty fast and he has great anticiapation, which makes him even faster.

    Q4. Besides Willis, what other Ole Miss player(s) should we keep an eye for this draft or even in future NFL drafts?
    Yes, Rory Johnson should be a late round pick at linebacker. He had a good season, only played one year after transferring from JC, but is quick and has good size.

    Q5. Which other SEC players can be considered "sleepers" in this year's draft who may have an impact in the NFL?
    Quinton Culberson from Miss. State could be considered a sleeper. A lot of the SEC teams will have a bunch of players in the draft, but most are so well known, I don't know if they're sleepers or not.

    I want to thank John Davis for taking the time to respond.....it is much appreciated!!!....tomorrow we will hear from Paul Strelow of The State newspaper in Columbia, S.C about the Clemson players, including stud defensive tackle Gaines Adams, who are preparing for the draft.....

    Tuesday, April 03, 2007

    A few Final Four thoughts

    Here are my thoughts on the Final Four....

    - I want Joakim Noah on my team....let’s be honest, the kid seems a little wacky but how many other All-American candidates go out and set picks or screens for his teammates?.....he is just as happy grabbing 10 rebounds and dishing out 5 assists instead of scoring 20 points....he plays with a controlled reckless abandon.... I could see him being the next Dennis Rodman at the next level....a player who will do all the dirty work for his team....

    - It seemed as if Florida coasted through the first four games of the tournament....but when it came to the Final Four, they kicked it up a notch against UCLA and Ohio State....

    - My favorite quote of the tournament - many people, including me, thought a hungry UCLA team would beat Florida after losing to them in last year’s title game.....before the game Noah commented, "be careful what you wish for"......he was right.....

    - I assume Noah, Horford, Brewer, and Green will be leaving for the NBA even though they are only juniors....

    - If Florida does lose those players, the Georgetown Hoyas will be the team to beat next year if Jeff Green or Roy Hibbert do not leave for the NBA.....

    - Greg Oden - gone....

    - Billy Donovan now has a tough decision to make - stay at Florida or go to Kentucky.....how many of his current Florida players return next season will be a factor.....say if all four Gators decide to forgo the NBA once again and try for a three-peat, then I believe Donovan stays.....but if the nucleus of his team leaves, look for Donovan to be in Kentucky blue next season....

    Monday, April 02, 2007

    Florida will repeat

    Florida - 4.5 vs. Ohio State
    Tonight Florida could make history by being the first team in 15 years to win back-to-back basketball titles....and I think Florida will do it, but there are some keys to the game....


    1. The Gators must take control of the game early and not let Ohio State hang around....if the Buckeyes are, at worst, within 6-7 points with 10 minutes to go, the Gators are in trouble....

    2. Florida must control Mike Conley.....let Greg Oden do what he wants, Conley is the key.....

    3. The Gators must not let up.....even if Florida is up by 20 points, they cannot relax until the game is officially over.....Ohio State is on a lucky streak right now and things are rolling for them.....just ask Tennessee or Xavier.....if Florida gives Ohio State even a small opening, the Buckeyes will take it....


    4. All the motivation favors Ohio State....the Gators whooped them earlier this year....plus OSU wants to avenge the BCS title game slaughter....

    5. God will be making another trip to the Georgia Dome tonight.....the Gators cannot let him bother them....

    In the end, Florida wins by 10.....


    Saturday, March 31, 2007

    Put me in coach - Here are the 07 baseball predictions

    PLAY BALL!!!....here are my predictions for the National League....
    NL East
    1. Phillies - Charlie Manuel may not make the season, but someone will push the right buttons with Howard, Utley, and Rollins in the lineup....Ryan Howard is the anti-Mark McGwire....don't be surprised if they trade for Mike Piazza late in the year since he is a Philly native....
    2. Mets - the Mets will lead the division at the start, but they lack starting pitching....unless they trade for someone at the break, they will fall short.....thank goodness for the wilcard....will have to trade youngster Milledge for pitching....maybe Milledge and others to Cleveland for one of their pitchers - C.C.?
    3. Braves - the A.T.L. may have the best pitching in the division....they need a big year from the Jones boys....
    4. Marlins - will someone please tell me how you fire the Manager of the Year?.....
    5. Nationals - it seems like years ago since that first year season in D.C......


    NL Central
    1. Brewers - the beer will be flowing in Milwaukee....

    2. Cubs - you have to give ownership credit - they went out and got a good manager and spent for the best free agent.....
    3. Cardinals - St. Louie got hot in the playoffs....but don’t forget they struggled down the stretch last season....
    4. Astros - Lance Berkman will take the MVP this year.....
    5. Pirates - things are starting to look up in Steeltown.....maybe the division next year?.....should have traded for Josh Hamilton....
    6. Reds - speaking of Hamilton....he will be one of the few bright spots in the Queens City....

    NL West
    1. Dodgers - LA will win a playoff series this year -- and maybe more.....should dominate a weak division....
    2. Padres - how much longer can Wells and Maddux go?......
    3. Diamondbacks - Brandon Webb may be the best pitcher no one knows about.....have some good young players coming up....
    4. Giants - its transition time in the Bay.....Bonds finishes with 32 homers....
    5. Rockies - at trade deadline time, contenders will be lining up for the services of Todd Helton.....

    NLDS
    Dodgers over Mets
    Phillies over Brewers
    NLCS
    Dodgers over Phillies

    Now to the Junior Circuit....
    AL East
    1. Yankees - maybe Carl Pavano will do something before the end of his contract.....
    2. Red Sox - you don’t spend all that money for D. Mat and not make the playoffs....after a year off, Beantown is back in the playoffs....Big Papi finally gets his MVP....
    3. Blue Jays - they locked up Vernon Wells and have Roy Halliday as an ace and BJ Ryan as a closer....too bad they are stuck with the Yanks and Bosox....
    4. Orioles - remember when the Orioles were always contenders....where have you Earl Weaver?...
    5. Devil Rays - good young talent....but same old team.....I have 1 word - contraction!!!.....

    AL Central
    1. Twins - starting pitching is the key....after Santana, there is not much there....great hitting team with Mauer, Morneau, Cuddyer, Hunter, and Kubel.....a Greg Maddux would look good in a Twins uniform....
    2. Tigers - lineup will be powerful with Sheffield on board.....pitching will be solid, but they will lose out to Boston for the wildcard....
    3. White Sox - they key is Mark Buehrle....he was in the tank last year....Chisox still have very powerful middle of the order in Thome, Konerko, and Dye....
    4. Indians - Sizemore is the best young player in the AL.....Hafner will crack 40+ homers....but their manager sucks....
    5. Royals - give this team a few years....like the Pirates in the NL, their worst days are behind them.....two words - Alex Gordon!!!....

    AL West
    1. Angels - this team has some of the best young players with Brandon Wood, Howie Kendrick, Jered Weaver, etc.....and don't forget Vlad is still there....
    2. Rangers - young pitcher Eric Hurley will give this team some hope....new manager Ron Washington is supposed to be a "player's manager".....
    3. Athletics - Billy Beane cannot pull a rabbit out of the hat every year....plus this is the first year without a Hudson, Mulder, or Zito in the rotation....
    4. Mariners - the most coveted prize at the trading deadline will be Ichiro....

    ALDS
    Twins over Red Sox
    Yankees over Angels

    ALCS
    Twins over Yankees

    World Series
    Twins over Dodgers - what the heck....it takes some grapefruits to go with the Twins....


    Final Four Predictions

    After doing some yardwork and painting around the house, I now have time to give my predictions for today’s Final Four....

    Georgetown -1 vs. Ohio State - from the beginning of the tournament I called for Georgetown to win the title, so I am not backing off now....however, Ohio State concerns me even though the Hoyas are the better team....but somehow the Buckeyes are on a lucky streak of late and we all know what could happen.....the 3 concerns I have are:
    1. Georgetown ripped Ohio State last year in the second round of the tournament....even though most of the Buckeye players from that team are no longer there, I know Thad Matta is using that for motivation....
    2. Like I stated earlier, Ohio State has been fortunate....a blown call in the Xavier game kept OSU alive....who knows what can happen now....
    3. God will be in the house....yes, Jim Tressel will be at the game....
    I still am going with Georgetown even though the sweatervested wonder will be at the Georgia Dome.....Georgetown by 6

    Florida -3 vs. UCLA - in my brackets, I had Florida playing Georgetown for the title....but this Bruins team is playing some solid basketball and great defense.....for 1 year the Bruins have been stewing about the shellacking they took from the Gators in last year’s title game....very few college teams have an opportunity to redeem themselves by playing basically the same team 1 year later.....UCLA will take advantage of the situation.....Bruins by 1 point....


    All I know, forget about Joakim Noah or Greg Oden stealing the show....the real show stopper is this UCLA cheerleader...WOW....




    Friday, March 30, 2007

    Five Good Questions with . . . David Andriesen of the Seattle Post-Intelligencer


    Today’s segment of "Five Good Questions with . . . " is with Seattle Mariners beat reporter David Andriesen of the Seattle Post-Intelligencer.....
    Q1. With a history of erratic pitching, which Jeff Weaver did the Mariners sign, the one who pitched for the Cardinals in the World Series or the one who was cut by the Angels?
    My first thought when they made that signing was, "Do they really not feel like they already have someone in the organization who can go out and lose 14 games next year -- and for the major league minimum instead of $8 million-plus?" But the Mariners are convinced he turned the corner when he was traded to St. Louis in the middle of last season. In talking with Jeff, it sounds like he really did get bogged down trying to make too many adjustments with the Angels and a lot of his problems were mental. He has not had a good spring, however, and will be the most expensive No. 5 starter in baseball.
    Q2. The Mariners have almost $26 million tied up in their two corner infielders, Sexson and Beltre. Which of those two players do you think could be traded during the season if the Mariners fall out of contention?
    Sexson is thought to be the more likely trade bait of the two. He doesn't hit for average but does hit a ton of home runs (just not in critical situations), which makes him appealing to other teams, especially someone with a smaller ballpark. The Mariners have several other options at first base, including Ben Broussard, who's on the bench but started for the Indians a year ago. Beltre brings the added dimension of terrific defense at a difficult position, and there is no obvious heir to third base in the organization.
    Q3. Pitcher Mark Lowe was impressive last season with his fastball. How are the Mariners going to utilize him?
    Mark's season ended prematurely with an elbow injury that has required two operations. He isn't expected back before midseason, and everyone will be holding their breath to see whether he comes back with the same stuff.
    Q4. Will manager Mike Hargrove make it through this season?
    Not unless they win and stay in the hunt for the division. The owner declared this winter that both Hargrove and GM Bill Bavasi are "on the hot seat," and the team brought in manager-in-waiting John McLaren, the No. 2 man behind Lou Piniella during Seattle's best years, as bench coach. If this team comes out of the gate 7-22 or something, Grover is probably history.
    Q5. Who is the best minor league player coming up for the Mariners and when will he make it to The Show?
    Baseball America says it's outfielder Adam Jones, a converted shortstop who is still learning to play center field and didn't hit in a major league stint last year. They need him to be ready to take over in case they trade Ichiro at the trading deadline or lose him after the season (he's in the last year of his contract with talks at a standstill). Last year's first-round draft pick, right-hander Brandon Morrow, absolutely blew everyone away this spring and it looks like he's going to make the team as a reliever despite having only a handful of minor league games under his belt.

    I want to thank David Andriesen for taking the time to respond.....it is much appreciated!!!!